Interpreting Quantum Gravity ∗ Dean Rickles †
نویسندگان
چکیده
In recent times physicists and philosophers of physics have tended to tread very different paths, and they have generally been a little suspicious of one another. As Michael Redhead points out in the first of his Tarner Lectures, “many physicists would dismiss the sort of question that philosophers of physics tackle as irrelevant to what they see themselves as doing” while “philosophers generally regard physicists as naive people, who do physics in an uncritical way” (1996, pp. 1-2). Reichenbach expressed much the same point even more strongly, suggesting that there is a “mutual contempt in which each misunderstands the purposes of the other’s endeavours” (1958, p. xi). This hasn’t always been the case, of course. As Reichenbach goes on to say, “[t]he classical philosophers had a close connection with the science of their times” (loc. cit.). The division between physics and philosophy is a fairly recent thing. In addition to this, historically, each time a fundamental revolution has occurred in physics—e.g. Newtonian mechanics; the relativity theories; quantum theory, etc...—there has generally been an associated shift to a more critical, reflective attitude towards theory construction. Kuhn appears to suggest that such a shift is necessary for scientific change to occur at all: ∗ c © D. Rickles, 2005. To appear in Studies in the History & Philosophy of Modern Physics (December, 2005). †Department of Philosophy, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada. email: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
A Package of Positions in the Philosophy of Physics
This is a very useful and easily assimilated summary of recent work in the philosophy of physics. It focuses on four areas: philosophy of non-relativistic quantum mechanics (David Wallace), foundations of statistical mechanics (Roman Frigg), philosophical aspects of quantum information theory (Chris Timpson), and current approaches to quantum gravity (Dean Rickles). The intended audience is ‘‘b...
متن کاملMirror Symmetry and Other Miracles in Superstring Theory
The dominance of string theory in the research landscape of quantum gravity physics (despite any direct experimental evidence) can, I think, be justified in a variety of ways. Here I focus on an argument from mathematical fertility, broadly similar to Hilary Putnam’s ‘no miracles argument’ that, I argue, many string theorists in fact espouse. String theory leads to many surprising, useful, and ...
متن کاملAdS/CFT Duality and the Emergence of Spacetime
The AdS/CFT duality has been a source of several strong conceptual claims in the physics literature. In this paper I focus on one of these: the extent to which spacetime geometry and locality can be said to emerge from this duality, so that neither is fundamental. I argue: (1) that the kind of emergence in question is relatively weak, involving one can of spacetime emerging from another kind of...
متن کاملTime and Structure in Canonical Gravity.1
In this paper I wish to make some headway on understanding what kind of problem the “problem of time” is, and offer a possible resolution—or, rather, a new way of understanding an old resolution.2 The response I give is a variation on a theme of Rovelli’s evolving constants of motion strategy (more generally: correlation strategies). I argue that by giving correlation strategies a structuralist...
متن کاملQuantum Gravity: A Primer for Philosophers∗
‘Quantum Gravity’ does not denote any existing theory: the field of quantum gravity is very much a ‘work in progress’. As you will see in this chapter, there are multiple lines of attack each with the same core goal: to find a theory that unifies, in some sense, general relativity (Einstein’s classical field theory of gravitation) and quantum field theory (the theoretical framework through whic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005